Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Workers' Compensation
- Law School
Recent Articles
Giving it up.
I am going to be discontinuing my participation in this blog in the next week or so. If you want someone to blame, blame 1) non-lawyers; 2) furries; and 3) the victims rights/tort reform industry. I am going to be discontinuing my participation in this blog in the next week or so. If...
CA1: large law firm loses case on behalf of client
US Securities & Exch v. Tambone, No. 07-1384. This is a close case. On the one hand, the government is bringing an enforcement action regarding misleading prospectuses to sell mutual funds. On the other hand, the defendants are represented by... US Securities & Exch v. Tambone, No....
CA1: It’s official. Everything is mail fraud.
US v. Hebshie, 07-2339 (12/4/08). This is a federal arson case. As you know, the framers of the constitution really envisioned the federal government prosecuting insurance fraud (or, as they say, “mail fraud”). The first says that pretty much any...US v. Hebshie, 07-2339 (12/4/08). This is a...
CA1: no preemption where no conflict – just assistance
Fitzgerald v. Harris, No. 08-1306 (12/5/08) holds that the Allagash Wilderness Waterway ("AWW"), Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 1882 is not preempted by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ("WSRA"), 16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq (which they...Fitzgerald v. Harris, No. 08-1306 (12/5/08) holds that the Allagash...
CA1: Drinking and driving isn’t accepting responsibility
U.S. v. Jordan, No. 08-1432 (12/5/08). The defendant committed some criminal acts while out on bail – namely drinking and driving. At sentencing, the District Court denied an offense level reduction under § 3E1.1 based on his putative acceptance of...U.S. v. Jordan, No. 08-1432 (12/5/08). The...
Another thing the Victims Rights Industry is Silent About
Most people know that the Victims Rights Industry exists to troll lay people into think that lawyers care about them. In reality it is a way for lawyers to earn money writing briefs without having to be accountable to actual...Most people know that the Victims Rights Industry exists to troll lay...
CA1: proper punishment for a stalker that refused to retain a lawyer before not paying taxes
USA v. Steirhoff, 08-1183. Selya tries to be dramatic. He says “The tale of how the stalker became the stalked follows.” Anyway, the defendant seems like a bad guy because he talked to the police without a lawyer. And he...USA v. Steirhoff, 08-1183. Selya tries to be dramatic. He says...
CA1: what to do about a shooting of a mentally ill person
Est. of D. Bennett v. Wainwright, No. 07-2169. Mentally ill guy off his meds shoots at some cops. Mentally ill guy gets shot by cops. There issues here of notes. The estate appeared to make a “loss of consortium” argument,...Est. of D. Bennett v. Wainwright, No. 07-2169. Mentally ill guy off...
CA1: surprise! creating false invoices to defraud Uncle Sam is corrupt
U.S. v. Marek, No. 07-2437 (11/26/08). This is sort of interesting. There was an audit by the IRS. The defendants appeared to participate in the audit in good faith. Problem was that they went so far as to procure back-dated...U.S. v. Marek, No. 07-2437 (11/26/08). This is sort of...
CA1: making non-lawyers step outside hotel rooms okay
US v. Parker, No. 07-2776. This is some kind of fight between drug dealers, so the First is going to have little sympathy for them. So, being asked to step outside one’s hotel room is not considered a “seizure.” Strangely,...US v. Parker, No. 07-2776. This is some kind of fight between drug...
