Business Associations Blog
The Business Associates Blog is a blog about corporate law and governance and legal education by Stephen Bainbridge, a William D. Warren Professor at UCLA School of Law.
Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Law School
Recent Articles
Director Primacy at Wikipedia
There’s a stub entry at Wikipedia on director primacy: Director Primacy is a theory of the firm that was introduced by Stephen M Bainbridge (Professor - UCLA School of Law) in an article in Northwestern University Law Review in 2003 Vol 97 No 2. He argues that traditional firm theory is...
Reshaping the Playing Field: Investor Activism
My essay Reshaping the Playing Field: Will investor activism change corporate governance and benefit shareholders? was published in the last issue of Regulation and is now available online. [continued on site]
Corporate Governance Topics Seminar
I’m teaching a topics in corporate governance research and writing seminar. I’m taking a new (to me) approach, which I thought I’d share. It’s going to be a lot of work for both the students and myself, but I’m very hopeful that we’ll get some high quality work...
Minority Shareholder Voice
Benjamin Means relies on “Albert Hirschman?s classic insight that exit and voice are interrelated mechanisms” to argue that: Because minority shareholder oppression is made possible by the normal features of the close corporation ? majority control, locked investment ? courts face the...
First Day Blues
I love teaching, but I’m almost always in a bit of a funk the first few days of the spring semester. Maybe because we start so early here at UCLA. Who knows? But relief may be at hand: The end of the holidays, cold weather and economic gloom will make today one of the most stressful days of...
Why not a MBCA or DGCL version of UPA (1997) 103(b)?
A Business Associations student asked a very perceptive question today: Why don’t the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Model Business Corporation Act have a provision equivalent to UPA (1997) section 103(b)? To be sure, the close corporation shareholder agreement sections of the...
Transactional Engineers or Entomologists
Jeff Lipshaw has posted a really fun and thoughtful paper, entitled Beetles, Frogs, and Lawyers: The Scientific Demarcation Problem in the Gilson Theory of Value Creation: Recently, Ronald Gilson described a transactional lawyer turned law professor as someone who was a beetle, but became an...
Vote for PB.com
I’ve been nominated as having one of the top law professor blogs by the ABA Journal: This site is home to UCLA law professor Stephen Bainbridgeâ??s three blogs devoted to law and business, wine and food, and punditryâ??the latter located appropriately on the right side of the page. How g...
The Insider Trading Charges Against Mark Cuban
The SEC today announced that: The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Dallas entrepreneur Mark Cuban with insider trading for selling 600,000 shares of the stock of an Internet search engine company on the basis of material, non-public information concerning an impending stock...
Stoneridge and the Supreme Court’s Dubious Track Record in Securities Cases
I recently ran across a very nice article by Professor Rodney Chrisman on the Stoneridge case, 26 QLR 839, in which he was kind enough to bring to bear a point I made about O’Hagan and extend it to Stoneridge: Commentators describe the Court’s opinion in O’Hagan with varying...

