Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Law School
real party in interest/standing/agency
Relitigation of lost profits was precluded by prior ruling on related patents
Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp., et al., C.A. No. 02-359-MPT, November 12, 2008. Thynge, M.J. Defendants’ motion to preclude plaintiff from relitigating lost profits based on issue preclusion is granted. Defendant Universal’s motion...
Stay is entered pending resolution of ownership
McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Italia S.P.A., et al., Civ. No. 06-28-SLR/LPS, November 5, 2008. Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing is stayed. Other pending motions are denied without prejudice to renew.The Court declines to adopt the Report and...
Reconsideration granted; Magistrate recommends finding of standing.
McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslog Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-SLR-LPS, August 29, 2008. Stark, M.J. Following submission of additional documentation, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion to reconsider its earlier recommendation of dismissal for lack of standing. Motions by...
Case is dismissed for lack of standing
McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslogic Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-(SLR-LPS), May 30, 2008.Stark, M.J. Magistrate recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted due to plaintiff’s lack of standing to sue. Defendants contend plaintiff has not shown it owns 100%...
