Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Law School
title 18
Alaska Supreme Court: Exhaustion of Internal Remedies
In an unpublished memorandum decision, the Alaska Supreme Court reversed Anchorage Superior Court Judge William Morse, and held that a State employee had, in fact, exhausted her grievance remedies under the APEA union contract. The Court remanded the implied covenant claim to Morse for a d...
Alaska Supreme Court: The Human Rights Act and Estoppel
The Alaska Supreme Court (per Fabe, C. J.) this Friday morning unanimously reversed Anchorage Superior Court Judge Sharon Gleason in a Title 18 case. The Supreme Court’s opinion narrows the circumstances under which a Human Rights Commission’s agency decision will preclude an in...
Alaska Supreme Court: Later-Disciplined Employees May Be Appropriate Comparators
The Alaska Supreme Court (per Justice Winfree) has held that a disciplined employee may look to the employer’s subsequent discipline of other employees for comparison under the objective wing of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In so ruling, the Court relied on Title VII ...
DAlaska: Collateral Estoppel in Title VII and Title 18
U. S. District Judge Timothy Burgess has accorded collateral estoppel effect to Superior Court judgments affirming the Alaska Human Right Commission’s dismissal of charges for lack of substantial evidence. Elsa Billingham had filed ASCHR and EEOC charges alleging that the State had ...
Alaska Supreme Court: ASCHR Closure for Lack of Evidence Does Not Bar Original Action in Superior Court
The Alaska Human Rights Act provides: “The acquittal of a person by the commission or a court of competent jurisdiction of any alleged violation of this chapter is a bar to any other action, civil or criminal, based on the same act or omission.” AS 18.80.280. If the Human Rights C...
