Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Law School
prop. 64 - injury in fact
New UCL standing decision: Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.
A new decision handed down yesterday, Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Dec. 9, 2008) (Fourth Appellate District, Division One), addresses Prop. 64 standing in some detail (slip op. at 48-61). I will post more on the decision...
Recent UCL "injury in fact" decision: Peterson v. Cellco Partnership
In Peterson v. Cellco Partnership, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 26, 2008; pub. ord. Jul. 21, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) held that the trial court properly sustained the defendant's demurrer without leave to amend. It...In Peterson v. Cellco Partnership, ___...
"UCL Standing to Seek Injunctive Relief: Is a Restitutionary Loss Required?"
The July/August 2008 issue of CAOC's Forum magazine just arrived in the mail. It has my latest article, "UCL Standing to Seek Injunctive Relief: Is a Restitutionary Loss Required?" The article addresses two opposing federal decisions on that topic, Walker...The July/August 2008 issue of CAOC's...
New UCL “injury in fact” decision: Medina v. Safe-Guard Products, Int’l, Inc.
In Medina v. Safe-Guard Products, Int’l, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 19, 2008) (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three), the Court of Appeal held that an insurance contract issued by an unlicensed insurer is nonetheless enforceable. The Court had some harsh...In Medina v. Safe-Guard P...
Supreme Court issues "grant and hold" order in Prop. 64 "injury in fact" case: O'Brien v. Camisasca Automotive Mfg., Inc.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued a "grant and hold" order in O'Brien v. Camisasca Automotive Mfg., no. S163207. The order reads: Petition for Review GRANTED. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues...On Wednesday, the Supreme Court...
