arbitrary

Insurer's Interpretation of Plan Language Concerning What Constitutes Working as a Full-Time Employee Was Arbitrary and Capricious

Vicki Johnson
October 17, 2008 16:11

In Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit reversed an insurer’s denial of life insurance benefits holding that it’s interpretation of the plan was arbitrary and capricious. In this case, a full-time employee signed up for life...

Insurer's Interpretation of Plan Language Concerning What Constitutes Working as a Full-Time Employee Was Arbitrary and Capricious

Vicki Johnson
October 17, 2008 16:11

In Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit reversed an insurer’s denial of life insurance benefits holding that it’s interpretation of the plan was arbitrary and capricious. In this case, a full-time employee signed up for life...

Insurer's Interpretation of Plan Language Concerning What Constitutes Working as a Full-Time Employee Was Arbitrary and Capricious

Vicki Johnson
October 17, 2008 16:11

In Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit reversed an insurer’s denial of life insurance benefits holding that it’s interpretation of the plan was arbitrary and capricious. In this case, a full-time employee signed up for life...

Insurer's Interpretation of Plan Language Concerning What Constitutes Working as a Full-Time Employee Was Arbitrary and Capricious

Vicki Johnson
October 17, 2008 16:11

In Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit reversed an insurer’s denial of life insurance benefits holding that it’s interpretation of the plan was arbitrary and capricious. In this case, a full-time employee signed up for life...

Insurer's Interpretation of Plan Language Concerning What Constitutes Working as a Full-Time Employee Was Arbitrary and Capricious

Vicki Johnson
October 17, 2008 16:11

In Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co., 541 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit reversed an insurer’s denial of life insurance benefits holding that it’s interpretation of the plan was arbitrary and capricious. In this case, a full-time employee signed up for life...