<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Articles tagged supreme court cases from LexMonitor</title>
    <link>http://www.lexmonitor.com/tags/4103341-supreme-court-cases?only_path=false</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>20 Most Recent Articles tagged supreme court cases from LexMonitor</description>
    <item>
      <title>Wanted: Law Professors To Sign On To SCOTUS Amicus Brief</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/wanted-law-professors-to-sign-on-to-scotus-amicus-brief.html</link>
      <description>See announcement below: Max Huffman (Indiana) and Austen Parrish (Southwestern) have written an amicus brief in the case British American Tobacco v. United States in support of a petition for cert. The cert. petition is part of a massive case...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:06:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/wanted-law-professors-to-sign-on-to-scotus-amicus-brief.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS Grants Cert in Vaccine Preemption Case</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/scotus-grants-cert-in-vaccine-preemption-case.html</link>
      <description>The BNA reports here: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, No. 09-152. Does Section 22(b)(1) of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which states that "[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/scotus-grants-cert-in-vaccine-preemption-case.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Further Commentary on Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/further-commentary-on-reed-elsevier-v-muchnick.html</link>
      <description>Readers who are following yesterday's SCOTUS decision in Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick may be interested in today's commentary by Professor Howard Wasserman (Florida International) over at PrawfsBlawg: Copyright and the (hopefully) end of drive-by jurisdictional rulings. See also additional coverage...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/further-commentary-on-reed-elsevier-v-muchnick.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary on Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick: A Win for Jurisdictional Clarity</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/commentary-on-reed-elsevier-v-muchnick-a-win-for-jurisdictional-clarity.html</link>
      <description>Below, Professor Scott Dodson (William &amp; Mary) comments on today's SCOTUS decision in Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick: Today, the Supreme Court decided Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick and held that &#167; 411(a) of the Copyright Act is not jurisdictional. At issue...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/03/commentary-on-reed-elsevier-v-muchnick-a-win-for-jurisdictional-clarity.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS Cert Grant of Interest: Harrington v. Richter</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/scotus-cert-grant-of-interest-harrington-v-richter.html</link>
      <description>This week the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Harrington v. Richter, No. 09-587, a habeas case out of the Ninth Circuit. Here are links to the opinion below, the docket, and SCOTUSblog's wiki on the case. From a federal-courts standpoint,...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/scotus-cert-grant-of-interest-harrington-v-richter.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS Decision In Hertz Corp. v. Friend: Where Is A Corporation's Principal Place Of Business?</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/scotus-decision-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-business.html</link>
      <description>Today the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Hertz Corp. v. Friend, covered earlier here, here, and here. The opinion, per Justice Breyer, begins: The federal diversity jurisdiction statute provides that "a corporation shall be deemed to be a...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/scotus-decision-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-business.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tyler on United States v. Klein</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/tyler-on-united-states-v-klein.html</link>
      <description>This paper might be of special interest to federal courts teachers who teach United States v. Klein. Professor Amanda L. Tyler (George Washington University Law School) has posted "The Story of Klein: The Scope of Congress's Authority to Shape the...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/02/tyler-on-united-states-v-klein.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eight Months of Iqbal</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/eight-months-of-iqbal.html</link>
      <description>I've been guest-blogging over at Concurring Opinions, and I have a few posts discussing how courts ought to make sense of federal pleading standards after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, what lower courts are actually doing, and the bills now pending in...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/eight-months-of-iqbal.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS on Intervention: South Carolina v. North Carolina</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-on-intervention-south-carolina-v-north-carolina.html</link>
      <description>No doubt most of today's SCOTUS-related attention is on the 183-page decision in Citizens United v. FEC. But our readers may be even more interested in yesterday's decision in South Carolina v. North Carolina, which involves that favorite of proceduralists--intervention....</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-on-intervention-south-carolina-v-north-carolina.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS Cert. Grant on Rule 15(c)(1)'s Relation Back Provision</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-cert-grant-on-rule-15c1s-relation-back-provision.html</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in a case involving the relation-back provision of FRCP 15(c)(1). The case is Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S.p.A., No. 09-337. Links to the docket, filings, and the Eleventh Circuit's opinion are available at SCOTUSBlog....</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-cert-grant-on-rule-15c1s-relation-back-provision.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS: No cameras in the Prop 8 trial courtroom</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-no-cameras-in-the-prop-8-trial-courtroom.html</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court has blocked cameras in the San Francisco federal courtroom where the challenge to California's Proposition 8 is proceeding to trial. SCOTUSblog has full coverage. RJE</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2010/01/scotus-no-cameras-in-the-prop-8-trial-courtroom.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Erie and Class Actions: Waiting for the Supreme Court's Decision in Shady Grove</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/erie-and-class-actions-waiting-for-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-shady-grove.html</link>
      <description>While many children are spending today waiting for Santa, I thought I'd talk about a Supreme Court decision that the civil-procedure world is eagerly awaiting: Shady Grove v. Allstate, which was arguedlast month. Unlike Santa, a Dec. 25th arrival is...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:07:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/erie-and-class-actions-waiting-for-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-shady-grove.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vladeck on habeas jurisdiction for Guantanamo detainees</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/vladeck-on-habeas-jurisdiction-for-guantanamo-detainees.html</link>
      <description>Over at Prawfsblog, Steve Vladeck has a good post on the jurisdictional issues raised by moving many of the Guantanamo detainees to the Thomson facility in Illinois. From the post: "Does this mean that all of the habeas petitions in...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/vladeck-on-habeas-jurisdiction-for-guantanamo-detainees.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Sotomayor, Civil Procedure, and the "Tradition" of Unanimous Debut Opinions</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/justice-sotomayor-civil-procedure-and-the-tradition-of-unanimous-debut-opinions.html</link>
      <description>Yesterday brought the Supreme Court's first decision in a case argued this Term. The Court in Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter writes: "The question before us is whether disclosure orders adverse to the attorney-client privilege qualify for immediate appeal under the...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/justice-sotomayor-civil-procedure-and-the-tradition-of-unanimous-debut-opinions.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS decision in Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter: the collateral order doctrine, discovery orders, and the attorney-client privilege</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/scotus-decision-in-mohawk-industries-v-carpenter-the-collateral-order-doctrine-discovery-orders-and-.html</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court today decided Mohawk Industries Inc. v. Carpenter, No. 08-678. (See here and here for our earlier coverage of the case.) Justice Sotomayor begins the opinion: "The question before us is whether disclosure orders adverse to the attorney-client...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/12/scotus-decision-in-mohawk-industries-v-carpenter-the-collateral-order-doctrine-discovery-orders-and-.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cert. grant in Morrison v. National Australia Bank: Is there federal subject-matter jurisdiction over "foreign-cubed" securities class action?</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/cert-grant-in-morrison-v-national-australia-bank-is-there-federal-subjectmatter-jurisdiction-over-fo.html</link>
      <description>Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. (08-1191). The questions presented are: 1) Do anti-fraud provisions of U.S. securities laws extend to transnational frauds when (a) foreign-based parent company conducted substantial business in United...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/cert-grant-in-morrison-v-national-australia-bank-is-there-federal-subjectmatter-jurisdiction-over-fo.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court hears argument on Statute of Limitations</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/supreme-court-hears-argument-on-statute-of-limitations.html</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today in Merck &amp; Co., Inc. v. Richard Reynolds, which raises thee question of when a statute of limitations begins to run on a federal securities fraud claim. The case will resolve a...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:53:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/supreme-court-hears-argument-on-statute-of-limitations.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coverage of SCOTUS Argument in Hertz Corp. v. Friend (Where Is a Corporation's Principal Place of Business?)</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/coverage-of-scotus-argument-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-busine.html</link>
      <description>One notable event during this oral argument (previewed here and covered here) was this exchange between Chief Justice Roberts and respondent's counsel: MR. SCHNEIDER: Mr. Chief Justice, did the Court have interest in the jurisdictional argument? CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/coverage-of-scotus-argument-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-busine.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Today's SCOTUS argument in Hertz Corp. v. Friend: Where is a corporation's "principal place of business"?</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/todays-scotus-argument-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-business.html</link>
      <description>As previewed earlier here, Hertz Corp. v. Friend presents the question of how to determine a corporation's principal place of business for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. The transcript from today's oral argument is available here. --A PS: Numerologists among you...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/todays-scotus-argument-in-hertz-corp-v-friend-where-is-a-corporations-principal-place-of-business.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yesterday's SCOTUS Argument in Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs. v. Allstate Ins. Co.</title>
      <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/yesterdays-scotus-argument-in-shady-grove-orthopedic-assocs-v-allstate-ins-co.html</link>
      <description>As previewed earlier here, Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs. v. Allstate Ins. Co. considers whether New York's bar on class actions for certain statutory-damages claims (N.Y. C.P.L.R. 901(b)) precludes class certification in a federal court diversity action. Among the relevant issues...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2009/11/yesterdays-scotus-argument-in-shady-grove-orthopedic-assocs-v-allstate-ins-co.html</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
