Channels
- Practice Area
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty & Maritime Law
- Advertising Law
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- AmLaw 200 Blogs
- Antitrust Law
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Rights & Privacy Law
- Consumer Law
- Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Education Law
- Election Law & Political Commentary
- Electronic Discovery
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- General Counsel Blogs
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Judiciary Law
- Media, Entertainment & Sports Law
- Law Firm Management & Legal Marketing
- Personal Injury & Medical Law
- Probate & Estate Planning
- Real Estate & Construction Law
- Tax & Financial Law
- Technology
- Whistleblower Law
- Workers' Compensation
- Law School
standing
Quickhits: Federal Judge Dismiss Aetna Data Breach Case Due to Lack of "Injury-in-fact"
A Federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed a class action lawsuit arising out of a data security breach involving Aetna, Inc. (original compliant found here). The basis of the dismissal was the plaintiff's lack of standing due to its...
Consumer Class Certification Denied -- Again
An up and down class action proceeding involving Listerine has taken a new turn. Pfizer Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No.B188106 (Cal. App. 3/2/10). Plaintiffs brought a proposed class action on behalf of California consumers who allegedly purchased Listerine on the claim that...
Kundis Craig on Standing and Environmental Law
Professor Robin Kundis Craig (Florida State University College of Law) has posted "Standing and Environmental Law: An Overview" on SSRN. The abstract states: Standing has long been one of the most common constitutional challenges in federal environmental cases. While standing...
California's Second District Court of Appeals Takes Narrow View of In re Tobacco II
When the California Supreme Court issued its opinion last summer in In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal. 4th 298 (2009), many commentators viewed it as a fundamental sea change in California's Unfair Competition Law jurisprudence, reading concepts of standing completely out of UCL class actions. ...
Texas Supremes Hold that a Litigant with Assigned Claims Was an Inadequate Class Representative
Yesterday the Texas Supreme Court issued a class action opinion that raises the fundamental question of what are the responsibilities of class representatives? In some jurisdictions, courts refuse to entertain challenges to the adequacy of class representatives, reasoning that so long as...
